{"id":84,"date":"2026-05-28T07:59:18","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T07:59:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.brysonrealestate.com\/?p=84"},"modified":"2026-09-01T05:36:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-01T05:36:00","slug":"davis-county-housing-market-report-april-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.brysonrealestate.com\/es\/davis-county-report\/davis-county-housing-market-report-april-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Informe del Mercado de Vivienda del Condado de Davis \u2014 Abril 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Davis County Housing Market Report \u2014 April 2026<\/h1>\n\n
\"Aerial
Davis County, Utah, looking east toward the Wasatch Front. Photo by David Reid.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

What is the Davis County housing market doing in April 2026?<\/h2>\n\n

Davis County’s median sale price reached $535,000 in April 2026<\/strong>, up 1.9% year-over-year, while sellers received a median of 98.2% of original list price<\/strong>. New listings surged 16.7% over April 2025 to 567<\/strong>, and homes sold in a median of 45 days<\/strong> \u2014 eight days faster than a year ago. Active inventory grew 10.8% YoY to 772 homes<\/strong> at month-end, giving buyers more selection without unwinding pricing. The headline tension this month: rising supply against still-tight mortgage rates that are keeping the buyer pool narrower than the listing count suggests.<\/p>\n\n

By Jared B. Bryson | Updated May 28, 2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n

Davis County at a Glance \u2014 April 2026<\/h2>\n\n

April was the month where Davis County’s spring market arrived in volume without breaking pricing. New listings climbed double digits, closed sales softened slightly, and the absorption rate cooled enough that months of supply ticked up to 2.4<\/strong> \u2014 still firmly seller territory by historical Wasatch Front norms, but the loosest April reading in three years.<\/p>\n\n

Davis County \u2014 April 2026 Headline Metrics<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\n
Metric<\/th>April 2025<\/th>April 2026<\/th>YoY Change<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n
New Listings<\/td>486<\/td>567<\/strong><\/td>+16.7%<\/td><\/tr>\n
Closed Sales<\/td>333<\/td>327<\/strong><\/td>-1.8%<\/td><\/tr>\n
Median Sale Price<\/td>$525,000<\/td>$535,000<\/strong><\/td>+1.9%<\/td><\/tr>\n
% of Original List Price Received<\/td>97.8%<\/td>98.2%<\/strong><\/td>+0.4 pts<\/td><\/tr>\n
Days on Market (median)<\/td>51<\/td>45<\/strong><\/td>-11.8%<\/td><\/tr>\n
Inventory (active, end of April)<\/td>697<\/td>772<\/strong><\/td>+10.8%<\/td><\/tr>\n
Months Supply of Inventory<\/td>2.2<\/td>2.4<\/strong><\/td>+12.9%<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table>
Source: UtahRealEstate.com RapidStats, Davis County, April 1\u201330, 2026. Inventory figure reflects active listings (Single Family + Townhouse + Condo) at month-end.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Three things stand out in those numbers. First, price held<\/strong>. A 1.9% YoY median lift in a high-rate environment is modest but it is positive \u2014 and it ran alongside meaningfully more supply. Second, homes sold faster despite more competition for buyers<\/strong> \u2014 45 days vs. 51 last April suggests that the homes that did<\/em> attract serious buyers cleared quickly, while the rest stretched out the inventory tail. Third, the seller’s share of price held the line. Sellers still netted 98.2% of original asking, slightly better<\/em> than April 2025.<\/p>\n\n

City-by-City Breakdown \u2014 April 2026<\/h2>\n\n

Davis County’s 15 cities ran very different races in April. The cleanest read of the local market is the per-city sales activity, paired with the active inventory profile (broken out by dwelling type) coming into May.<\/p>\n\n

Davis County Sales Activity by City \u2014 April 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\n
City<\/th>New Listings<\/th>YoY<\/th>Closed Sales<\/th>YoY<\/th>Median Sale Price<\/th>YoY<\/th>% of OLP<\/th>DOM<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n
Bountiful<\/td>74<\/td>+27.6%<\/td>34<\/td>-19.1%<\/td>$567,250<\/td>-2.1%<\/td>98.2%<\/td>61<\/td><\/tr>\n
Centerville<\/td>22<\/td>-8.3%<\/td>16<\/td>+33.3%<\/td>$610,573<\/td>+34.9%<\/td>98.7%<\/td>33<\/td><\/tr>\n
Clearfield<\/td>34<\/td>+47.8%<\/td>27<\/td>-3.6%<\/td>$411,000<\/td>-3.2%<\/td>99.1%<\/td>40<\/td><\/tr>\n
Clinton<\/td>29<\/td>-14.7%<\/td>20<\/td>-25.9%<\/td>$515,000<\/td>+12.2%<\/td>97.6%<\/td>46<\/td><\/tr>\n
Farmington<\/td>42<\/td>+31.3%<\/td>23<\/td>+4.6%<\/td>$717,690<\/td>+9.7%<\/td>97.2%<\/td>34<\/td><\/tr>\n
Fruit Heights<\/td>9<\/td>+80.0%<\/td>4<\/td>-20.0%<\/td>$824,000<\/td>+40.9%<\/td>98.6%<\/td>17<\/td><\/tr>\n
Kaysville<\/td>41<\/td>-12.8%<\/td>24<\/td>+60.0%<\/td>$731,000<\/td>+32.9%<\/td>97.2%<\/td>32<\/td><\/tr>\n
Layton<\/td>140<\/td>+14.8%<\/td>74<\/td>-1.3%<\/td>$517,500<\/td>-4.2%<\/td>98.3%<\/td>51<\/td><\/tr>\n
North Salt Lake<\/td>46<\/td>+64.3%<\/td>27<\/td>+22.7%<\/td>$551,000<\/td>+11.9%<\/td>97.6%<\/td>49<\/td><\/tr>\n
South Weber<\/td>17<\/td>+70.0%<\/td>3<\/td>-75.0%<\/td>$844,200<\/td>+50.3%<\/td>97.9%<\/td>40<\/td><\/tr>\n
Sunset<\/td>13<\/td>+44.4%<\/td>9<\/td>+125.0%<\/td>$399,900<\/td>+1.4%<\/td>98.8%<\/td>23<\/td><\/tr>\n
Syracuse<\/td>52<\/td>+15.6%<\/td>36<\/td>-10.0%<\/td>$557,000<\/td>-6.8%<\/td>99.2%<\/td>31<\/td><\/tr>\n
West Bountiful<\/td>2<\/td>-66.7%<\/td>0<\/td>-100.0%<\/td>\u2014<\/td>\u2014<\/td>\u2014<\/td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr>\n
West Point<\/td>21<\/td>-12.5%<\/td>14<\/td>-22.2%<\/td>$575,000<\/td>+5.5%<\/td>98.6%<\/td>57<\/td><\/tr>\n
Woods Cross<\/td>19<\/td>+18.8%<\/td>15<\/td>+150.0%<\/td>$529,900<\/td>+7.6%<\/td>96.7%<\/td>82<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table>
Source: UtahRealEstate.com RapidStats, Monthly Local Market by city, April 2026. West Bountiful had 0 closed sales in April; median, OLP, and DOM are not computable.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

A few interpretive notes from the city-level data:<\/p>\n\n